In Art Gallery News

Sanford Biggers: Drift at the Parrish Art Museum

May 19, 2026 In Art Gallery News 6 Mins Read

All Rights Reserved ©photographybykurt.net

The Clouds, Quilts, Sand, and Stories That Stay With You

Some exhibitions are easy to walk through quickly. You take a few photos, glance at the artwork, and move on before you even reach the parking lot. Others stay with you long after you leave. Sanford Biggers: Drift at the Parrish Art Museum is one of those exhibitions.

Attending the opening TALK | SANFORD BIGGERS: DRIFT on May 16 with artist Sanford Biggers and Parrish Art Museum, Chief Curator Corinne Erni completely changed the experience for me. Hearing Biggers speak before walking through the galleries gave the exhibition an entirely different level of depth and emotional weight. Once I understood the meaning behind the clouds, quilts, sand installations, graffiti influences, Buddhism, and layered symbolism, the work immediately felt more personal and powerful. I was no longer simply looking at art. I was connecting to the stories inside it.

While walking through Sanford Biggers: Drift, I unexpectedly thought back to a visit I made years ago to Curaçao and the Kura Hulanda Museum. Standing inside a place once tied to the selling of enslaved people changes the way you look at objects forever. I remember learning there how textiles and handmade pieces often carried stories far deeper than decoration. Nothing felt accidental. Every object seemed to hold memory, survival, pain, culture, and resistance all at once.

That same feeling returned while walking through this exhibition. The work stopped feeling like something to simply observe and became something to feel.

The cloud motif runs throughout Sanford Biggers: Drift, beginning with the monumental ceiling installation Unsui (Cloud Forest). Clouds appear again in sculptures, paintings, quilt works, and even outside the Museum welcoming visitors before they enter. At first glance, the clouds feel peaceful and almost playful. After hearing Biggers explain their meaning, they begin to carry emotional weight connected to movement, freedom, spirituality, transformation, and memory.

During the artist talk, Biggers shared that clouds first entered his artistic language through graffiti culture in Los Angeles after seeing the iconic hip hop film Wild Style as a teenager. He described becoming immersed in graffiti, breakdancing, visual storytelling, and hip hop culture at a young age. Clouds became part of that visual vocabulary alongside bubble letters, arrows, shadows, and forced perspective.

Years later, while living in Japan and studying Buddhism, the cloud returned again in a spiritual context. Biggers spoke about learning the Buddhist term Unsui, loosely translating to “cloud water” or “sky water.” The term refers to monks who move through the world unattached and open to transformation.

That idea quietly follows you throughout the exhibition. Drift. Movement. Freedom. Becoming.

How Sanford Biggers Blends Buddhism, Hip Hop, Quilts, and American History Into One Powerful Exhibition

One of the most impressive aspects of Sanford Biggers: Drift is how naturally so many influences coexist within the work. Buddhism, Los Angeles graffiti culture, Gee’s Bend quilts, African sculpture, Japanese mandalas, breakdance floors, prayer rugs, and American history all flow together effortlessly. Nothing feels forced or overcrowded. Everything feels layered and intentional.

The quilt works especially stayed with me. Biggers’ Codex series uses antique quilts layered with paint, abstraction, symbols, and sculptural interventions. During the conversation, he discussed the long-rumored belief that quilts may have carried hidden codes for enslaved people escaping through the Underground Railroad. Whether fully documented or partially mythologized over time, Biggers embraces that uncertainty and describes these works as objects for “future ethnography.”

That phrase lingered in my mind long after I left the Museum.

Biggers is not simply preserving history. He is collaborating with it. He is adding another layer onto something that already carried generations of memory before it ever reached his hands.

The hip hop influence reappears here in a powerful way. Biggers compared the quilts to musical sampling. He described finding antique quilts almost like discovering an old James Brown record, then reshaping it, layering onto it, remixing it, and creating something entirely new without erasing where it came from.

That perspective completely changed the way I viewed the work. The quilts stopped feeling historical and started feeling alive.

The sand installation creates a similar emotional tension. At first glance, the work feels meditative and calm. Then you realize how fragile it actually is. One wrong movement could disrupt the entire piece. Inspired by Buddhist mandalas, prayer rugs, breakdance floors, and impermanence, the sand installation creates a sense of awareness inside the room that is difficult to explain until you experience it yourself.

Biggers also spoke about how performance exists inside the work itself. The making of the installation becomes performance. The viewer becomes part of the performance. Even the tension and silence inside the room become part of the artwork.

You can feel that tension while standing there.

The exhibition is part of the Parrish Museum’s larger USA250 initiative leading up to America’s 250th anniversary. Through Biggers’ work, ideas like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness suddenly feel far more layered and complicated than the patriotic phrases people often reduce them to.

Who gets remembered?
Who gets erased?
Who gets freedom?
Who gets to pursue happiness?

The exhibition never forces answers onto the viewer. Instead, it quietly creates space for reflection.

That is what makes Sanford Biggers: Drift feel so important right now. The exhibition asks people to slow down, look deeper, and reconsider the stories we inherit and the stories we continue telling.

The Parrish Art Museum itself becomes part of the experience. The architecture, natural light, stone, shadows, sand, and even the Hamptons sky outside feel connected to the work unfolding inside the galleries.

Friends and Family of the Sanford Biggers -All Rights Reserved ©photographybykurt.net

Photos honestly cannot capture the feeling of this exhibition. You need to stand underneath the clouds. You need to see the texture of the quilts up close. You need to feel the silence surrounding the sand installation. You need to experience how the room changes once you begin understanding the layers beneath the surface.

Sanford Biggers and his wife *Arana Hankin*, All Rights Reserved ©photographybykurt.net

Real talk, this is one of those exhibitions that reveals something different every time you look at it.

Vanessa Leggard & Sanford Biggers, Photo: PhotographybyKurt.net

Sanford Biggers: Drift does not scream for attention. It quietly changes the atmosphere around you before you even realize it.

Go see it.

Then go back and see it again. SANFORD BIGGERS: DRIFT at the Parrish Art Museum in Watermill, NY – May 17–September 13, 2026

Sunday, June 14, 2 PM | Artist-Led Tour during Community Day (free and open to all)
Friday, July 24, 3 PM | Curator-Led Tour
Sunday, August 16, 11:30 AM | Artist Talk
Friday, September 4, 6 PM | Artist-Led Tour
Friday, September 4, 7 PM | Member Closing Reception

Real Talk. Real People. Real Art.

In Health

Could the Epstein-Barr Virus “Kissing Virus” Be Behind More Than Just Mono?

May 7, 2026 In Health 5 Mins Read

We’ve all heard of Mono. Maybe you had it in high school and disappeared for weeks, living on naps and popsicles, or maybe you just remember it as the “kissing disease” that took someone out for a season. What no one tells you is that the Epstein-Barr Virus doesn’t pack up and leave once you feel better. It moves in and stays.

The Epstein-Barr Virus infects about 95% of adults, which means almost everyone reading this has it sitting quietly in their body right now. Most of the time, the Epstein-Barr Virus behaves itself, but sometimes it doesn’t; and that is where things start to get interesting.

For years, lupus has been treated like one of those frustrating medical mysteries. Why does the body suddenly turn on itself? Why does it attack healthy tissue like it forgot whose side it’s on? New research is pointing to the Epstein-Barr Virus as a possible trigger, and not in a small way.

Here is the real talk version. Your immune system is supposed to protect you. Think of it like your personal security team. The Epstein-Barr Virus is the hacker that gets into the system, flips a switch, and suddenly, your security team is working against you. That is exactly what researchers are seeing, especially in people with lupus.

What really stands out is that people with lupus have significantly higher levels of these hijacked immune cells. The Epstein-Barr Virus is not just hanging out. In some cases, it is actively interfering with how the body functions.

Then there is multiple sclerosis, and this is where the conversation really shifts. Research has shown that your risk of developing MS increases dramatically after infection with the Epstein-Barr Virus. In fact, one of the largest studies ever done, led by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, found that the risk of MS increased 32 times after Epstein-Barr Virus infection. Even more eye-opening, virtually every person in the study who developed MS had previously been infected with the Epstein-Barr Virus, while cases in people without the virus were extremely rare. Let that sink in for a second.

Now before everyone panics, having the Epstein-Barr Virus does not mean you are going to develop a serious illness. Most people do not. But it does raise a bigger question. Why do some people stay perfectly fine while others deal with chronic conditions?

The Epstein-Barr Virus is part of a much bigger picture. Genetics matter. Stress matters. Hormones, environment, lifestyle, all of it plays a role. Think of the Epstein-Barr Virus as loading the gun, but something else pulls the trigger. That is why this conversation matters.

Here is where it gets even more interesting and honestly something we should all be paying attention to. The Epstein-Barr Virus may also be connected to long-term inflammation, and that is where aging and even cancer risk come into the conversation.

Organizations like the Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation have been studying how chronic inflammation affects the body over time. The Epstein-Barr Virus can create a state of low-level, ongoing inflammation, something researchers are now calling inflammaging. It is not loud, it is not obvious, but it slowly wears the body down.

That kind of constant immune stress linked to the Epstein-Barr Virus does not mean it directly causes cancer, but it can create an environment where the body is not as strong at protecting itself from damage. Over time, that matters.

Researchers are also looking at the Epstein-Barr Virus in connection with chronic fatigue, Long COVID, and other autoimmune conditions. One of the reasons is that the Epstein-Barr Virus can reactivate when your body is under stress. So if you have ever felt completely fine and then suddenly exhausted or off for no clear reason, there may be more going on beneath the surface.

Let’s bring this back home for a second. We live in a world where everyone is pushing, juggling, and running on empty more often than we admit. Your immune system is constantly trying to keep up. The Epstein-Barr Virus loves those moments when your body is run down. That is when it has the opportunity to stir things up.

The good news is that science is finally catching up. Now that researchers are identifying the Epstein-Barr Virus as a key player, they are working on real solutions. Vaccines are being developed to prevent it. New treatments are being designed to target only the infected cells instead of shutting down the entire immune system.

That is a big shift from where we have been.

The bottom line is this. The Epstein-Barr Virus is common, it is persistent, and it is finally getting the attention it deserves. It may not be the whole story, but it is clearly part of it. For the first time, we are not just managing symptoms. We are starting to understand what is actually driving them.

Real talk, real people. And maybe it is time we stop thinking of Mono as “just Mono.”

In Sag Harbor

Sag Harbor, This Story Has Layers

May 4, 2026 In Sag Harbor 3 Mins Read

Mardsen Street 2026 -After the 2023 Vote

Real talk.

What’s happening on Marsden Street in Sag Harbor didn’t just start in 2023, and it didn’t start with bulldozers either. This story has been building for decades, shaped by decisions, disagreements, and a community that has always cared about what happens here.

And now that we’re seeing the outcome, a lot of people are asking the same question: What actually happened after Sag Harbor voted no?

It Started Long Before We Were Paying Attention

Back in the 1970s, the Marsden lots were already raising concerns. The land was cleared for development, and neighbors questioned the environmental impact and what it would mean for the area. Different decade, same tension. Which makes you wonder…

Was Marsden Street ever not going to be developed?

Then Came the 2023 Vote

In 2023, the Sag Harbor School District proposed purchasing the land for $9.425 million. That’s when the real divide happened.

Some saw opportunity.
Others saw uncertainty.

And the biggest question at the time was simple:

Why did Sag Harbor vote no?

For many residents, it came down to this:

No clearly defined plan
Concerns about environmental review
Questions about long-term cost

Not rejection for the sake of rejection.
More like hesitation without enough clarity.

The Part We Didn’t Sit With Long Enough

Here’s the question that didn’t get enough attention: What happens if the community says no? Because land doesn’t sit still waiting for clarity. It moves.

What Happened After the Vote

And now we know. After the vote failed, the property remained private. It was sold, subdivided, and is now being developed into residential homes. That’s not speculation. That’s reality. So the better question now becomes:

Was the outcome avoidable, or was it always part of the equation?

Who Benefited

When public acquisition falls through, private development usually follows. That’s exactly what happened here.

The developer benefits.
Future homeowners benefit.

And the community? That’s where it gets personal. Because now the question isn’t just what happened. It’s:

Did this outcome align with what Sag Harbor actually wanted?

The Lesson That Lands Differently Now

Looking at Marsden Street today changes how the original decision feels.

At the time, it felt like:
Pause.
Wait.
Ask more questions.

Now it looks like:
Missed opportunity to control the outcome; and that brings us to the bigger takeaway: Saying no doesn’t stop development. It changes who controls it.

What Comes Next

So now let’s bring it back to where we are today in Sag Harbor. This isn’t just about Marsden Street anymore.

It’s about the next vote.
The next proposal.
The next moment where the community has to decide. Maybe the better question moving forward is not just: What are we voting against? But: What are we saying yes to instead?

Let’s Talk

Looking at it now… Would you make the same decision? Or does seeing it built out change everything?

In OPINION

Nick LaLota’s Town Hall: Filtered Questions, Limited Answers, and Growing Concerns

March 20, 2026 In OPINION 4 Mins Read

Real Talk. Real People. Real Impact. While others talk, we are asking what matters.

There is something about a Nick LaLota town hall conducted over the phone that already feels filtered. There is no room, no crowd, no raised hands, and no real-time accountability. Instead, there is a voice, an operator, and a promise that questions will be taken from constituents.

What Actually Happened

During the recent Nick LaLota town hall, constituents were told that questions would not be cherry-picked. However, the structure of the call suggested otherwise. Participants were required to submit their questions through an operator, who then decided which questions would be asked. This process creates a level of control that is not present in traditional, in-person town halls.

Delays and Priorities

One of the most noticeable aspects of the Nick LaLota town hall was the delay before the discussion truly began. The call appeared to wait until thousands of participants had joined, suggesting that the number of listeners was a priority. By the time the conversation gained momentum, the available time for meaningful engagement had already been reduced.

Time and Cost Concerns

At one point during the Nick LaLota town hall, a comment was made about the cost associated with extending the call. This raised an important question about priorities. If this format replaces in-person town halls, then time should be allocated to ensure that as many constituent questions as possible are addressed, regardless of cost.

The Question That Was Not Asked

A key concern during the Nick LaLota town hall was that certain questions were not addressed at all. One such question focused on votes against federal spending bills that included funding for housing and environmental programs. This question directly relates to issues affecting Long Island residents, including housing affordability and water quality.

Local Impact on the East End

The issues raised but not addressed during the Nick LaLota town hall are not abstract policy debates. Housing affordability continues to be a pressing concern, workforce housing remains limited, and environmental issues, including water quality, are ongoing challenges. These are real problems that require direct and transparent responses.

Government Shutdown Reality

The Nick LaLota town hall also included a discussion about government shutdowns and their impact. Workers from the Transportation Security Administration continue to report to work during shutdowns, often without immediate pay. This creates financial strain and uncertainty for thousands of essential workers.

Statements on Shutdowns

During the Nick LaLota town hall, the Congressman stated that shutting down the government is short-sighted and harmful, particularly for TSA employees. This statement reflects a widely recognized reality, as shutdowns disrupt lives and services without producing consistent long-term policy outcomes.

Assigning Blame

The Nick LaLota town hall also included the assertion that Democrats are responsible for government shutdowns. However, shutdowns typically occur when multiple branches of government fail to reach an agreement. Responsibility is shared across parties and institutions, making the situation more complex than a single point of blame.

The ICE Discussion

Another topic raised during the Nick LaLota town hall involved immigration enforcement. It was stated that Immigration and Customs Enforcement continues operating during shutdowns. While this is partially accurate, ICE benefits from different funding structures, while agencies such as TSA experience more immediate financial impacts.

The Epstein Files Exchange

A more serious moment during the Nick LaLota town hall occurred when a constituent asked about the Epstein files. The Congressman expressed support for transparency, accountability, and the protection of victims. He emphasized that anyone involved in wrongdoing should be held accountable, while also ensuring that victims are not retraumatized.

Transparency and Accountability

The response to the Epstein question during the Nick LaLota town hall demonstrated that when substantive questions are asked, substantive answers can follow. However, this also highlights the importance of ensuring that all relevant questions are allowed to be addressed.

The Bigger Picture

The overall structure of the Nick LaLota town hall raises broader concerns about access and accountability. When questions are filtered and time is limited, the conversation becomes controlled. This limits the ability of constituents to engage directly on issues that matter most to their communities.

Real Talk

The Nick LaLota town hall format makes it difficult to reconcile claims of transparency with a system that screens questions. Waiting for thousands of participants to join, while limiting the number of questions answered, creates a disconnect between access and engagement.

Final Thought

The Nick LaLota town hall included a statement that compromise is necessary in government. While that may be true, meaningful compromise begins with open and honest dialogue. Dialogue, in turn, requires listening to constituents without filtering or limitation.

Real Talk. Real People. Real Impact.

👉 If your question was not asked during the Nick LaLota town hall, what would you have wanted to say?

In Community News

Who Powers the Hamptons? A Traffic Story That Hits Close to Home.

March 19, 2026 In Community News 6 Mins Read

Traffic, Housing, and the Real People Behind the East End Economy. To understand the Hamptons workforce housing crisis, start with traffic. Anyone who has ever sat on County Road 39 knows the routine. Coffee in hand, patience running low, inching forward while questioning life choices. I once called it a “rolling therapy session,” and honestly, that still feels accurate.

But here is the thing. That traffic is not just an inconvenience. It is a moving reflection of the Hamptons workforce housing reality. Those cars are filled with the people who make this place work.

The People Behind the Hamptons Lifestyle

The Hamptons workforce housing conversation is not about buildings. It is about people! Its the teachers shaping the next generation. It’s the nurses working long shifts. It’s the restaurant staff who make sure your dinner arrives just right. It’s the landscapers who maintain the beauty that defines the East End.

The Hamptons may be known for luxury, but it runs on everyday people, and without real solutions for the Hamptons workforce housing, those people are being pushed further away from the communities they serve.

Summer in the Hamptons Runs on Workers

Every summer, the demand for Hamptons workforce housing becomes impossible to ignore. Restaurants double their staff. Hotels bring in additional housekeeping teams. Catering companies prepare for a season of weddings that feel like small cities gathering for a night. Landscaping crews expand overnight.

Many businesses rely on seasonal programs like the H-2B visa and the J-1 visa to fill positions when local labor is not available. Without this workforce, the Hamptons summer experience simply would not exist. But even with these programs, the Hamptons workforce housing shortage remains front and center.

The Housing Reality No One Can Ignore

Here is the uncomfortable truth about Hamptons workforce housing: the people who work here often cannot afford to live here. Rents are sky high. Home prices are out of reach. A single bedroom can cost more than a full paycheck for many workers. This forces people to commute from farther west in Suffolk County or share housing in ways that are far from ideal.

Some employers step in and rent houses for staff. Others try to provide stipends. But the reality is simple. Hamptons workforce housing is no longer just a housing issue. It is a workforce issue.

Who Will Do the Laundry

In a previous Hamptons Mouthpiece article, I asked a question that stuck with people. Who will do the laundry? That question cuts to the core of the Hamptons workforce housing crisis. Communities cannot function without the people who keep them running.

We can build luxury homes. We can welcome visitors. But without workers, none of it works. The Hamptons workforce housing conversation is about preserving the balance between a destination and a community.

The Hidden Housing System Behind the Scenes

Behind the scenes, the Hamptons workforce housing solution often looks very different from what people imagine. Employers quietly rent houses and place multiple workers inside. Hotels create staff housing arrangements.

Workers share rooms, coordinate their schedules, and rely on their employer’s transportation to get to work. It is a system that keeps businesses open, but it is not a long-term solution to the Hamptons workforce housing challenge.

The Complicated Side of Seasonal Work

The Hamptons workforce housing conversation also intersects with immigration and labor systems. Temporary workers often come through legal programs tied to specific employers. That structure can create stability for businesses, but it can also make workers feel dependent on their employer for both income and housing.

At the same time, agencies like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigate worksite violations and enforce immigration laws. The result is a system that can feel complicated for both employers and workers navigating the realities of Hamptons workforce housing.

Will This Summer Look Different

This is where the Hamptons workforce housing conversation becomes very real for 2026. Across seasonal communities like the Hamptons, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket, business owners are asking the same question. Will this summer feel different?

Between rising housing costs, ongoing traffic challenges, and increased awareness of immigration enforcement, there is growing uncertainty about the seasonal workforce. When the workforce is uncertain, the Hamptons workforce housing issue becomes even more urgent.

The Economics No One Talks About

Here is the Real Talk side of Hamptons workforce housing. If employers have to pay for housing, that cost does not disappear. It shifts, and some businesses may absorb it. Others may raise prices. Some may adjust wages or limit hiring. Others may increase pay to attract workers willing to commute. There is no one answer, but one thing is clear, Hamptons workforce housing is now part of the business model.

Traffic Is the Symptom, Not the Problem

That daily drive on County Road 39 is more than just congestion. It is a visible sign of the Hamptons workforce housing crisis. Those cars represent long commutes, early mornings, and workers doing what they need to do just to stay employed on the East End. When people cannot live where they work, traffic becomes the connector between the workforce and the economy. And when that connection breaks, the impact is felt everywhere.

What Happens If Nothing Changes

If the Hamptons workforce housing crisis continues unchecked, the consequences will not be subtle. Restaurants will reduce hours. Hotels will limit bookings. Schools will struggle to hire teachers. Healthcare systems will feel the strain. This is not hypothetical. It is already happening in small ways.

The Hamptons workforce housing conversation is about preventing those small cracks from becoming larger problems.

A Reason for Optimism

Despite the challenges, there is still hope in the Hamptons workforce housing conversation. Local initiatives, including efforts connected to the Southampton Town Housing Authority, are beginning to address the need for workforce housing. Conversations are happening. Ideas are being explored. The Hamptons have always been a place of reinvention.

There is no reason it cannot lead the way in solving the Hamptons workforce housing challenge as well.

The Question We Cannot Ignore

So the next time you are sitting in traffic, take a moment and look around. Every car is part of the Hamptons workforce housing story. Someone is heading to work. Someone is making your dinner. Someone is teaching your children. Someone is caring for your family.

The Hamptons is more than a destination. It is a community. And communities only work when the people who power them have a place to live.

Real Talk. Real People.

Vanessa Leggard